Linked Life Data

7154800

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7154800

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-3-24
pubmed:abstractText
Of all anti-reflux operations fundoplication has proved the most effective method in experimental and clinical examinations [3, 5, 9, 12, 13]. In 1979 Angelchik reported a silicon prosthesis as an anti-reflux barrier which proved effective in examinations on patients. An explanation for these results is still missing [1]. Our examinations in dogs show that: 1. anti-reflux prosthesis is an effective anti-reflux barrier in dogs after circular myectomy; 2. silicon prosthesis proved to be equally as effective as fundoplication with regard to reflux prevention; 3. the mechanism of action is a mechanical one. The difference between silicon prosthesis and fundoplication is, that the fundoplication represents a 'ring' around the LES, which is elastic and is subject to the same regulations as the LES, and that it can relax in a swallowing reflex manner. In the silicon prosthesis the 'ring-formation' is only mechanical.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0023-8236
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
357
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
295-303
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
[Silicone anti-reflux prosthesis--an artificial fundoplication?].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract