Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-1-7
pubmed:abstractText
Three recently described methods for quantitative sampling of the bacterial flora of the vagina were evaluated and none proved satisfactory. In a third of the samples, paired swabs showed large differences between the two weights of vaginal secretion collected by this method, and the recovery rate of bacteria deliberately added to test swabs was unsatisfactorily low. A calibrated loop gave a wide variation in the amount of secretion collected, due to variations in density and viscosity of the secretion. When secretion was collected with a calibrated pipette, it was often difficult to expel the collected volume from the pipette for testing. The simple weight-based method was devised in which a loop was used to collect an undefined volume of secretion for weighting in a tube of transport medium before homogenisation and quantitative bacteriological testing. Initial assessment indicates this to be a satisfactory method for quantitative studies of the vaginal bacterial flora.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0022-2615
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
15
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
141-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
Quantitative methods for studies on vaginal flora.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't