Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1982-5-12
pubmed:abstractText
One hundred seventy-five patients with metastatic breast cancer, treated with a combination chemotherapy (Cooper regimen), were analyzed retrospectively to identify the value of the traditional prognostic parameters (disease-free interval; menopausal status; dominant site of metastatic lesion) for the stratification of patients before randomization. Response rate and survival time were not significantly affected by the disease-free interval and menopausal status. A significant difference was detected among the three categories of dominant disease (locoregional; osseous; visceral). However, an estimate of total extent of disease (according to Swenerton) was found to be the most important factor for predicting response and survival time after combination cytotoxic treatment. The differences between the dominant size of metastatic disease are mainly influenced by different size of metastatic spread. Therefore, there is found a significant correlation between the different types of dominant lesions and total extent of disease. In conclusion, the particular sites of metastatic spread seem to be of less importance than overall extent of disease in predicting the outcome. A critical evaluation of the three traditional stratification parameters and introduction of a semiquantitative estimation of total tumor burden as a new stratification parameter seems to be necessary when planning and comparing future trials.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0171-5216
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
102
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
289-99
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
The value of prognostic parameters for the stratification of advanced breast cancer patients.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article