Linked Life Data

7041612

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7041612

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1982-6-14
pubmed:abstractText
A study to determine the necessity of routine blind subcultures when using the radiometric BACTEC-460 instrument for detection of bacteremia was conducted. In the first phase, blind subcultures were performed on day 10 of incubation; in the second phase, blind subcultures were performed on day 4; in the final phase the subculture was performed on day one. During the study, 6,208 blood cultures from 2,455 patients were inoculated into three different culture media. There were 454 microbial isolates recovered, including 269 presumed pathogenic isolates. The single significant discrepancy between blind subculture and radiometric detection was a case of Staphylococcus epidermidis septicemia in which the organism was detected 48 hours earlier by blind subculture. There were no cultures in which significant bacterial isolates were detected by blind subcultures but not radiometrically. Thus, under the conditions of this study, routine blind subcultures are not necessary when using the BACTEC radiometric system for detection of bacteremia.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0002-9173
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
77
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
328-32
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
Routine subcultures shown to be unnecessary in radiometric detection of bacteremia using three media.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study