Linked Life Data

6891140

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6891140

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-2-14
pubmed:abstractText
Both the 'counter' immunoelectrophoresis method and the complement-fixation test were employed to study a total of 767 samples of blood sera taken from rams. Five-hundred and seventeen of these were taken from ram flocks in which the infection was recorded by the clinical and the bacteriological method and the remaining 517 samples were taken from rams of intact flocks. A comparative evaluation was made of the two methods for the diagnosis of the disease when the animals were alive. Results made it clear that the 'counter' immunoelectrophoresis method was advantageous and could be used as a perspective adjunct in diagnosing the disease.
pubmed:language
bul
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0324-1068
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
19
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
40-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
[Counterimmunoelectrophoresis in the diagnosis of infectious epididymitis in rams].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract