Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2-3
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-7-15
pubmed:abstractText
A total of 116 translumbar aortofemoral angiograms were performed in 92 patients. At random, 58 contrast injections were done with Hexabrix and 58 with Angiografin mixed with lidocaine. Pain and heat sensation was evaluated by a verbal rating system. Most patients in both groups had no or mild pain sensation. There was, however, a slight but statistically significant difference (p less than 0.05) in favor of Hexabrix. No difference was found in heat sensation in either of the groups.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0378-9837
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
52
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
141-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1983
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial