Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
5
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1983-6-23
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Members of the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) were surveyed to determine their views on the content and quality of their annual meeting. Responses were received from 1,208 members. ARA members were generally positive about the major components of the annual meeting program, but there were significant differences in opinion between practitioners and academicians. Practitioners favored a reduction in basic science material and an increase in didactic clinical sessions. Academicians were more likely to feel that recent annual meetings have adequately addressed their educational needs. These findings have implications for the planning of future annual meetings of the ARA.
|
| pubmed:grant | |
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
May
|
| pubmed:issn |
0004-3591
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
26
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
577-80
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1983
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
An evaluation of the annual meeting of the American Rheumatism Association. Results of a membership survey.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|