Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-6-23
pubmed:abstractText
Many patients discontinue prophylactic lithium treatment against medical advice. Knowledge of patient attitudes towards lithium treatment may help explain and prevent non-compliant behaviour. One hundred and forty patients given lithium treatment from 2 to 17 years were asked what they found most advantageous about the treatment and what they found most disadvantageous. Seventy-five per cent of the patients experienced freedom from symptoms and the reestablishment of social functions in the family and in work as the main benefit of the treatment. Twenty-five per cent perceived no other advantages than possibly the satisfaction of demands from the family or the doctor. Seventy per cent of the patients considered various somatic and non-somatic complaints the main disadvantage of lithium treatment and 30% found no disadvantages at all. Psychological and other non-somatic complaints related to work, training, patient status, and the administration of lithium tablets were almost as frequent as somatic complaints. The advantages and disadvantages perceived by the patients did not necessarily correspond with the physician's perception of good or bad treatment response or the presence of unwanted effects.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0001-690X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
67
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
8-12
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1983
pubmed:articleTitle
Patient attitudes towards lithium.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article