Linked Life Data

6813834

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6813834

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1982-12-16
pubmed:abstractText
Two hundred and seventeen patients undergoing digestive tract surgery, either randomly or non-randomly allocated in two separate groups, and presenting postoperative hypoxemia, were studied during intensive care : 77 were ventilated by continuous positive pressure (CPP), 70 by intermittent positive pressure (IPP), and 70 were treated by classical respiratory physiotherapy. Results showed that CPP was the method of choice for ventilatory assistance following digestive tract surgery: hematosis was improved in a prolonged manner without modification of CO2 levels. The other procedures had a beneficial effect on PaO2 but at the price of a hyperventilation. Patients receiving IPP developed hypocapnea and hypoxemia five minutes after the end of the treatment. Physiopathological bases for these differences in gasometric behaviour in patients undergoing digestive tract surgery are analyzed as a function of the characteristics of CPP on the one hand, and IPP and respiratory physiotherapy on the other.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0032-5821
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
135-42
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
[Effects of three types of respiratory assistance (continuous positive pressure, intermittent positive pressure, classical respiratory physiotherapy) on PaO2 and PaCO2 in patients undergoing digestive tract surgery].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Controlled Clinical Trial