Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-9-10
pubmed:abstractText
Fertility after varicocele correction by embolization of the vena spermatica in 62 subjects was compared with fertility in an untreated group (n = 20) of subjects with varicocele. One year after varicocele correction of infertile males with oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, or teratozoospermia but normal follicle-stimulating hormone levels, 15 of 62 had achieved a pregnancy; in the untreated group, 8 had achieved a pregnancy. Comparison of results by cumulative pregnancy rate analysis reveals that the pregnancy rate was only marginally higher in the treated group. Varicocele correction induced only a modest improvement of sperm quality; the severity of varicocele had no influence either on sperm characteristics or on the outcome of treatment. It is concluded that the effects of varicocele correction on the pregnancy rate can be seriously doubted and that large-scale prospective studies are urgently required to determine whether or not varicocele correction improves the pregnancy rate and which subjects could eventually benefit from the treatment.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0015-0282
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
42
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
249-56
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Improved fertility after varicocele correction: fact or fiction?
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't