Linked Life Data

6737024

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6737024

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-8-7
pubmed:abstractText
The action potentials of single neurons were recorded extracellularly throughout the rostral vestibular nuclei and subadjacent reticular formation in three alert, juvenile, rhesus monkeys. Neuronal responses were tested during a) sinusoidal pitch oscillations in darkness, b) cancellation of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) during similar oscillations by fixation of a target moving with the head, c) sinusoidal vertical smooth pursuit, d) vertical saccades, and e) fixation with the head stationary. Eye movements were measured using the magnetic field-search coil technique. Of the 527 neurons isolated, 318 responded to pitch oscillation and/or vertical eye movements. The latter cells could be classified into six categories. Of this group, 273 cells were recorded from for sufficient time to allow them to be fully tested and form the basis of this report. Cells were classified as follows: pure-vestibular cells with firing rates modulated only by head velocity (15%), vestibular-pause cells that were similar to the pure-vestibular cells but paused for saccades in all directions (10%), gaze-velocity cells that modulated their rates in proportion to vertical eye velocity in space (7%), position cells with rates modulated by changes in eye position in the head but that did not burst or pause during saccades (33%), position-burst cells that also carried an eye-position signal but did burst during saccades in one direction and paused in the opposite direction (15%), and position-vestibular-pause cells that carried signals proportional to eye position in the head and head velocity and paused during all saccades (20%). Most cells that carried an eye-position signal also carried an eye-velocity signal during pursuit. Position and position-burst cells could be divided into two subcategories. Position cells that also reported head velocity represented 20% of the total sample, while those without head-velocity signals made up the remaining 13%. Position-burst cells were divided into two subcategories based on their behavior during pitch oscillation in darkness. Both carried eye-velocity signals during pursuit, but only one type (8% of the total sample) also carried an eye-velocity signal during vestibular eye movements in the dark, while the other (7%) did not. Some cells in all six categories except the pure-vestibular cells responded antidromically to stimulation of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF). Only the position-vestibular-pause, position-burst, and gaze-velocity cells, however, were judged to be commonly antidromically activated, suggesting that these three cell types are the major contributors to the MLF from the rostral vestibular nuclei.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0022-3077
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
51
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1121-36
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Signals in vestibular nucleus mediating vertical eye movements in the monkey.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't