Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-8-20
pubmed:abstractText
Streak artefacts running across images of the aorta can mimic aortic dissection on CT. We have compared 12 patients suffering from dissection with 45 others. Some artefacts were found in every patient. Such misleading appearances were more obtrusive in dissectors. However, we have found several pointers that help distinguish true intimal flaps from artefacts. Flaps are usually thin structures showing mild curvature. Artefacts are generally linear and vary in thickness. Their orientation may change markedly from one CT section to the next; they frequently extend beyond the confines of the aorta. In the ascending aorta, artefacts usually run at an angle of approximately 66 degrees to the coronal plane; especial care should be taken before diagnosing a straight intimal flap in that orientation. Careful study of images on the monitor rather than on film is a further help in the important distinction between artefact and intimal flap.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0363-8715
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
8
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
688-93
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Streak artefacts of the thoracic aorta: pseudodissection.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article