Linked Life Data

6695949

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6695949

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-3-9
pubmed:abstractText
To determine whether the results of voided urine cultures in men are affected by meatal cleansing, midstream sampling, or circumcision status, 308 paired (initial and midstream) specimens were collected from 254 urology clinic patients. Half of the patients cleansed their urethral meatus with povidone-iodine prior to voiding. The circumcision status of all patients was noted. The rates of true bacteriuria (growth of 10(4) or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with a single predominant species) and contamination (growth of 10(3) or greater colony-forming units/ml urine with two or more colonial types) were compared in the various collection technique subgroups. Neither the bacteriuria nor contamination rates were significantly different (p greater than 0.05) in circumcised and uncircumcised patients, or in those who cleansed their meatus and those who did not. Contamination, but not bacteriuria, rates were higher in initial as compared with midstream specimens. These data suggest that the clean-catch midstream void procedure is unnecessary for obtaining routine voided urine culture specimens from men.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0002-9343
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
76
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
257-62
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.