Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1983-7-29
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Physical examination, mammography and fine-needle aspiration cytology were performed in 1498 consecutive cases with a solitary solid lump of the female breast. The intent was to verify the validity of this diagnostic triplet in the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Clinically sure cancers were excluded from the study. The collected data were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity and predictivity of any procedure alone or in combination. In 1138 cases confirmed by histology (514 carcinomas and 669 benign or non-neoplastic lesions), the physical examination and mammography were very sensitive (respectively 96% and 84%) but with a high rate of false-positive reports (respectively 20% and 18%). The cytologic diagnosis was less sensitive (65%), mostly due to many inadequate smears, but highly specific (93%) and predictive for malignancy (99%) when the cytologic report was frankly positive. Any single procedure improved the overall sensitivity, and taken together this triplet appears to be the most effective noninvasive diagnostic combination that provides in a short time with minimal cost and discomfort, a diagnosis of certain malignancy in about 50% of carcinomas with a predictivity close to 100%, when cytology detected malignancy.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Apr
|
| pubmed:issn |
0300-8916
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:day |
30
|
| pubmed:volume |
69
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
137-41
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-12-12
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1983
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis by physical, radiologic and cytologic combined examinations.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|