|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1984-9-25
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
A randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of centbucridine (0.5%) with those of lidocaine (2%) as an anaesthetic agent was conducted in the dental outpatient department on patients attending for dental extraction. One hundred and twenty patients were studied. The degree of analgesia attained with centbucridine compared well with that obtained with lidocaine. The compound was well tolerated with no significant changes in the cardiovascular parameters and no serious side-effects.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0251-1649
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
3
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
251-5
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Aminoacridines,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Anesthesia, Dental,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Anesthetics, Local,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Blood Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Heart Rate,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Lidocaine,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Tacrine,
pubmed-meshheading:6678822-Tooth Extraction
|
|
pubmed:year |
1983
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A comparative study of centbucridine and lidocaine in dental extraction.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|
