Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1984-2-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In the surgical treatment of gastric ulcer (G,U,), the same techniques have been employed as have been used in duodenal ulcer (D.U.). This correspondence also holds true with superselective vagotomy and proximal gastric vagotomy (P.G.V.). The technique was primarily indicated in the treatment of D.U. and had very exciting preliminary results, above all owing to its reduced morbidity both immediately and late after surgery, and to its almost null mortality. With a view to analyzing the results of the use of P.G.V. in the treatment of gastric ulcer, thirteen patients were operated upon who were bearers of G.U. not associated with D.U. nor prepyloric ulcer. There were no operating accidents or immediate post-operative complications, nor was there any mortality. In the post-operative period following lasting an average of 17.7 months, we observed the clinical manifestation of the ulcer and symptoms accompaning the operation in addition to performing endoscopy on all of the patients. Eight patients were absolutely asymptomatic after surgery; one had slight dysphagia that diminished about 3 months after P.G.V. Three patients had recurrence of the symptoms of ulcer and one complained of intense epigastric fullness, vomting, weight loss, and a crisis of diarrhea. Radiologic and endoscopic examinations showed that this last patient had hypotonia and marked gastric stasis that were corrected surgically by means of antrectomy and the reconstitution of GI tract by the BI technique, with good results. In three patients endoscopy showed postoperative recurrence of the G.U., one of whom is assymptomatic with the clinical treatment; the other two were submitted to antrectomy with BI anastomosis in one and a 2/3 gastrectomy with BI reconstruction in the other. The cure of the lesion in 23% of the cases in the post-operative follow-up lasting an average of 17.7 months permits us henceforward to contra-indicate the P.G.V. used per se for the treatment of G.U.
|
pubmed:language |
por
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0004-2803
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
20
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
41-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Gastric Acid,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Stomach Ulcer,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Vagotomy,
pubmed-meshheading:6661091-Vagotomy, Proximal Gastric
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Critical analysis of the treatment of gastric ulcer by proximal gastric vagotomy].
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
English Abstract
|