Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1978-8-28
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
A comparative study between Etomidate and Thiopentone was carried out on 100 healthy female patients scheduled for post-partum abdominal sterilization under epidural analgesia. Our results show Etomidate to be a safe and effective induction agent, comparable to Thiopentone in having a rapid onset of action and rapid recovery time. The pulse rates and blood pressures remained relatively stable during the use of Etomidate. However, there was a high incidence of transient respiratory upsets while causing less respiratory depression than Thiopentone. The objectionable features of Etomidate are high incidence of pain on injection and involuntary muscular activity, which account for the low anaesthetist acceptance rate.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
May
|
| pubmed:issn |
0310-057X
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
6
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
129-33
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1978
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Clinical evaluation of etomidate as an induction agent.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|