Linked Life Data

6637447

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6637447

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3-4
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-12-17
pubmed:abstractText
The function of the maxillary ostia (phi 0.22-4.7 mm) has been evaluated in experiments on a nose-sinus model with variable sinusal volumes. A piston-pump producing to-and-fro volumes of 467 cm3 of air per revolution was used at a speed of 10 and 20 revolutions per minute (rpm). Three different techniques were used: simultaneous pressure recording in the sinus and the nose (Method I); simultaneous recording of the differential pressure between nose and sinus and the air-flow through the ostium (Method II); recording of the pressure rise inside the sinus upon the application of a constant artificial air-flow of 16,7 cm3 . s-1 or 2.0 cm3 . s-1 (Method III). All variables were recorded on an ink-jet recorder and onto tape when using methods I and II for later analysis on an x-y recorder. A pressure relationship of 1 : 1 was found between nose and sinus, independently of ostial diameters, sinusal volumes and piston-pump rates. The first method did not permit an isolated determination of the ostial function as the pressure values recorded are affected by ostial diameters, sinusal volumes and piston-pump rates. The pressure-flow relationship recorded with the second method was found to be dependent only on the ostial diameters. Hysteresis was observed at ostial diameters less than or equal to 1.63 mm. This is due to ostial diameter, sinusal volume and the rate of the nasal pressure changes. This method is suitable for an isolated determination of the ostial resistance, from which the equivalent ostial diameter can be calculated. With the third method using static air-flows and pressures the results are independent of the sinusal volume. This method is suitable for estimation of the ostial airway resistance and the equivalent ostial diameter. A striking similarity was observed between the results obtained with the last two methods in estimating equivalent ostial diameters.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0001-6489
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
96
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
295-305
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Patency tests of the maxillary ostium--model experiments.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study