Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:dateCreated |
1983-11-23
|
pubmed:abstractText |
A double-blind study was carried out in obese patients with moderately severe hypertension to assess the efficacy and tolerability of 2.5 mg indapamide as a once-a-day Step 1 drug compared to 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide also as a once-a-day Step 1 drug; to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed daily dose of 2.5 mg indapamide administered concomitantly with methyldopa starting at 500 mg daily; and to compare the findings of efficacy and tolerability of 2.5 mg indapamide daily with those of 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide daily as Step 1 agents when methyldopa is the Step 2 drug. Twenty-nine patients completed the study and were evaluated. Nine patients achieved the study criterion of reduction of average standing diastolic pressure to 90 mmHg or less when treated with Step 1 medication only. Twenty patients required the addition of methyldopa to their Step 1 medication: 10 patients took 2.5 mg indapamide with an average constant daily dose of 1100 mg methyldopa and 10 patients took 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide with an average constant daily dose of 1575 mg methyldopa to achieve blood pressure control. All groups had mean diastolic pressure controlled at or below the 90 mmHg criterion during the period of constant methyldopa dosage for those patients who required Step 2 therapy. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to diastolic pressure during the constant dosage period. The indapamide patients required significantly (p less than 0.05) less methyldopa than did the hydrochlorothiazide patients in order to maintain satisfactory control of diastolic blood pressure. The number of responders was greater in the 2.5 mg indapamide + methyldopa group than it was in the 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide + methyldopa group, and responses were achieved more rapidly in the former group than in the latter. Indapamide (2.5 mg per day) was effective and well tolerated when used alone or as Step 1 medication in combination with methyldopa as Step 2 medication, and it compared favourably in this regard with hydrochlorothiazide.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0300-7995
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
8 Suppl 3
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
93-104
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Diuretics,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Dose-Response Relationship, Drug,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Drug Therapy, Combination,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Hydrochlorothiazide,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Hypertension,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Indapamide,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Methyldopa,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Obesity,
pubmed-meshheading:6617242-Time Factors
|
pubmed:year |
1983
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Indapamide in the stepped-care treatment of obese hypertensive patients.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Controlled Clinical Trial
|