Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-4-9
pubmed:abstractText
The results of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial showed no significant difference in mortality from coronary heart disease between intervention and control groups despite an apparent success of the intervention against cigarette smoking. A reanalysis of the published data indicates that the effectiveness of the smoking intervention may have been overestimated. The researchers counted those who smoked pipes or cigars at screen as nonsmokers and attempted to classify cigarette smokers who switched to pipes or cigars during the trial as successes whether or not they continued to inhale the smoke. It is unreasonable to assume a priori that inhaling pipe or cigar smoke is less dangerous than cigarette smoke. Moreover, attempting to include pipe and cigar smokers, who may have been inhaling smoke, among the successes makes biochemical validation of claims of abstinence overly lenient. When levels of serum thiocyanate are used to obtain an objective index of smoking reduction, it appears that the effect of intervention was considerably smaller than has been reported, and failed to reach design goals over the first 4 years. This could help to explain the disappointing mortality results.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0091-7435
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
501-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
An evaluation of the intervention against smoking in the multiple risk factor intervention trial.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't