Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-4-15
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Previous methods for the qualitative evaluation of visual field instruments are subject to certain limitations. A system is proposed to overcome these deficiencies. It has been developed from experiences of a clinical study involving 5 different visual field instruments. The method uses 4 levels of analysis and permits separate appraisals of diagnostic potential and detailed inter-instrument comparative evaluation.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Dec
|
| pubmed:issn |
0012-4486
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:day |
15
|
| pubmed:volume |
58
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
319-24
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1984
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: I. Scoring system.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|