Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1984-11-9
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The spatial resolution and noise level of images produced by a commercial analog tomographic scanner have been measured and compared to those of images reconstructed digitally from projections from the same detector. The full width at half maximum of the line spread function was 3.6 mm for images from the analog scanner and 1.1 mm for the digitally reconstructed images. The standard deviation of the CT numbers over a 10-cm2 circular area at the center of a large water phantom, calculated as a percentage of the linear attenuation coefficient of water, was 3.5% for the analog images, 15.4% for high-resolution digital images, and 3.2% for digital images reconstructed using a convolution filter which reduced the resolution to that of the analog images. The data contributing to each digital image were fewer than those contributing to each analog image by a factor of 10. The noise level did not depend on tube current in either the analog or the digital images. The utility of this analog device in radiation therapy planning will depend upon whether errors in contour localization resulting from transferring data from diagnostic CT scanners exceed the errors due to its poorer image quality.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0094-2405
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
11
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
502-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:articleTitle |
Image quality of an analog radiation therapy simulator-based tomographic scanner.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|