Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-11-9
pubmed:abstractText
In order to compare the rigidity of the fixation and resultant bone healing of monocortical versus bicortical osteosynthesis, biomechanical tests were performed in dogs. Use of a gnathotome made it possible to produce a mandibular fracture with minimal bone defect between fragments. An AO dynamic compression plate and a mini-plate were used for the fixation of each half side of the fractured mandible. The biomechanical tests revealed that bicortical osteosynthesis was superior to monocortical in the rigidity of the fixation. However, the results after removal of the plates, at 14 weeks postoperatively, showed that there was no apparent difference between the 2 sides. Monocortical osteosynthesis is useful in the treatment of mandibular fractures, except for fractures with bone defects, comminuted fragments and laceration of the lateral cortical bone.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0300-9785
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
307-12
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Biomechanical study on monocortical osteosynthesis for the fracture of the mandible.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study