Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-1-9
pubmed:abstractText
Between March and December 1979, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) compared the CAVP16 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide) and MV (mitomycin and vinblastine) regimens in 200 patients with metastatic non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Most patients were ambulatory (ECOG performance status, 0, 1; 75%) and had not received prior radiation therapy (76%). The CAVP16 regimen resulted in one complete and 13 partial responses (14%) and the mitomycin and vinblastine regimen resulted in two complete and 11 partial responses (13%). These results did not differ significantly (P = 0.45) nor did the results for median survival, 18 weeks for each regimen. Good performance status and prior surgical resection were positive predictors of improved survival. Toxicity was significant with eight drug-related deaths, six due to leukopenia and infection and one each due to renal failure and interstitial pneumonitis. CAVP16 resulted in significantly more serious and life-threatening toxicity (P less than 0.0001). Neither regimen is recommended for further study.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0361-5960
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
68
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1325-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide versus mitomycin and vinblastine (EST 2575, generation IV).
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.