Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-2-15
pubmed:abstractText
Two commercial kit systems, the API Staph-Ident system (Analytab Products, Inc., Plainview, N.Y.) and the DMS Staph-Trac system (DMS Laboratories, Inc., Flemington, N.J.), were compared with conventional methods for the identification of nine species of coagulase-negative staphylococci. The API Staph-Ident system, a biochemical and chromogenic substrate micromethod, correctly identified 95 of 120 (79.2%) clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci after 5 h of incubation. The DMS Staph-Trac system, a miniaturized biochemical test system which requires a 24-h incubation period, correctly identified 106 (88.3%) of the same isolates. Both commercial systems were similar in cost and amount of technologist time required to inoculate and read each system. The clinical value of routine species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci has not yet been established. The decision by clinical laboratories of whether to adopt this practice will be greatly facilitated by the availability of commercial kit systems which are both rapid and accurate.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-1127260, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-13969076, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-14329964, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-170303, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-365879, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-4749820, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-580432, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6339546, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6752190, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6841586, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6890071, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6918401, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6924937, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-6985785, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-7002032, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-708013, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-7119097, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-7130375, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-739158, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-841471, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/6361063-864011
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
19
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
68-72
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of the API Staph-Ident and DMS Staph-Trac systems with conventional methods used for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study