Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-12-17
pubmed:abstractText
Two hundred patients in a major Indian hospital who were undergoing clean operations participated in a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial of the effectiveness of systemic antibiotics in preventing wound infectious. Of the patients on antibiotics 12.6% developed wound infections and of those not on antibiotics 13.3% did--a difference of no significance. Other factors analysed which included age, duration of operation, place on the operating list and length of the incision did not appear to effect the incidence of infection. Wound infection delayed the discharge of the patient from hospital by seven days. Avoiding antibiotic prophylaxis in these operations would have saved our hospital 12,500 pounds a year. We suggest that prophylactic antibiotics are ineffective in preventing wound infection after clean operations in India. Their use is wasteful and should be discouraged.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0035-8843
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
65
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
400-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1983
pubmed:articleTitle
The place of antibiotics in preventing wound infection after clean operations in an Indian hospital: a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial