Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-12-20
pubmed:abstractText
Double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations of scopolamine, physostigmine, arecoline, and tetrahydroaminoacridine (THA) in normal adults and in dementia of the Alzheimer-type (DAT) were reviewed to determine the relative sensitivity of various assessment procedures in the measurement of drug effects. In normal adults, word list learning techniques have been most widely employed and have been sensitive to drug effects. In DAT, a wide variety of assessment procedures have been employed. Based on the limited number of possible comparisons across studies, two procedures appear to be useful: word list learning tasks that generate an index of intrusion errors, and visual recognition tasks. The lack of standardized assessments limits the ability of investigators to replicate studies, to compare relative efficacy of various drugs, or to address a number of other questions that are fundamental to the development of effective cholinergic treatments for DAT.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0197-4580
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
4
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
139-45
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1983
pubmed:articleTitle
Measurement of cholinergic drug effects on memory in Alzheimer's disease.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Review