Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1984-6-25
pubmed:abstractText
Forty-eight neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia were randomly allocated to receive, as antifungal prophylaxis, either ketoconazole, 400 mg once daily (K), or amphotericin B tablets and lozenges (A), or both ketoconazole and amphotericin B together (K + A). Antifungal prophylaxis was considered to have failed if (1) there was evidence of increasing colonization of the oropharynx or faeces with Candida spp. or other yeasts, or (2) if systemic antifungal therapy was begun empirically. Prophylaxis failed in nine of 17 patients given K, in four of 19 given A, and in four of 12 given K + A. The differences between the three regimens were not statistically significant, neither was there any significant difference in the mean duration of neutropenia before prophylaxis failed. The absorption of ketoconazole was impaired when patients were neutropenic. We conclude that ketoconazole was neither more nor less effective than amphotericin B in the prevention of yeast colonization in neutropenic patients.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0195-6701
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
5
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
83-91
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1984
pubmed:articleTitle
Oral ketoconazole and amphotericin B for the prevention of yeast colonization in patients with acute leukaemia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't