Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1980-5-23
pubmed:abstractText
Some 4,263 women from special, family planning and gynecologic clinics were screened at random for the presence of H. vaginalis (C. vaginale) infection. Twenty-four percent of the women from the special clinics, 6% from the family planning and 4% from the gynecology clinics were culture positive although microscopic findings were somewhat higher than this. Of 582 women attending special clinics who were infected solely with H. vaginalis, only 261 complained of having an offensive discharge. Two hundred thirty-eight women reported "no symptoms," but 116 of them did have an offensive discharge on examination. These 582 women were treated with either ampicillin, ampicillin with probenecid or sulphonamide vaginal tablets. All were largely effective. Direct microscopy was regarded as being a reliable guide to H. vaginalis infection.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0024-7758
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
24
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
71-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1980
pubmed:articleTitle
Haemophilus vaginalis infection. Diagnosis and treatment.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial