Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
10
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1984-10-25
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We reviewed the pathology materials from 691 patients with lung cancer who participated in therapy protocols with the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. We found good agreement (94%) between pathologists over the separation of small-cell carcinomas from non-small-cell carcinomas. Thus, oncologists and cooperative groups should rely on their local pathologists' diagnoses for the major choices of therapies in lung cancer and realize that there remain a small number of overlapping tumors that are not uniformly diagnosed by routine light microscopy and that require more sophisticated techniques if their diagnosis is to be accurate.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-9985
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
108
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
792-4
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
1984
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Separation of small-cell from non-small-cell lung cancer. The Southeastern Cancer Study Group pathologists' experience.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|