Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1979-11-29
pubmed:abstractText
The efficacy of the "oxygenator", vincamine was assessed in comparison to a classic vasodilator, papaverine, after parenteral administration during the first days of an acute thrombo-embolic stroke. All 263 patients admitted to this open trial had a thrombo-embolism of the A. carotis or one of its cerebral branches within the previous 24 h. Patients demonstrating minimal neurological deficit or requiring admission to an intensive care unit, or patients with a suspected hemorrhagic syndrome were excluded. Each patient received i.v. infusions (15 mg X 6) of 6 vials of vincamine per 24 h, or 6 vials of papaverine (40 mg X 6) per 24 h, occasionally in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), dipyridamol and hydrocortisone. An initial 3-h control was followed by regular surveillance for 5 days, paying special regard to consciousness and motricity. The administration of vincamine alone had a significantly more favourable effect than papaverine alone on consciousness (p less than 0.001). Furthermore, vincamine associated with other drugs was significantly superior (p less than 0.01) to papaverine given in association. A similar tendency was noted for motor recuperation after vincamine compared to papaverine (p less than 0.001). Vincamine and papaverine were well tolerated during the 5-days observation period, only one side effect after vincamine and four after papaverine being noted.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0004-4172
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
29
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
671-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1979
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparative study of the clinical effect of vincamine versus papaverine given parenterally in the acute phase of stroke.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study