Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1979-1-15
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Depending on the type of the inhibitor and its concentration one can experimentally induce two forms of aberrant microfibril orientations in O. solitaria cell walls through microtubule inhibitor application. The first form, designated "Intermediate", is characterized by the presence of cortical microtubules together with a spiral arrangement of microfibrils. The second form, designated "Parrallel", shows a wall with bundles of parallel oriented microfibrils without cortical microtubules. Taking colchicine as an example for a microtubule-inhibitor the "Parallel" form may be obtained with 10mM and the "Intermediate" with 5 to 1 mM solutions. Some microtubule-inhibitors such as methylbenzimidazole-2yl-carbamate (MBC) produce the "intermediate" form only. The recovery of normal microfibril orientation after inhibitor treatment is dependent on three factors: a) the developmental stage--young autospores just beginning to synthesize a wall are absolutely necessary; b) the application of inhibitors with the lowest effective concentration for c) the shortest possible time. Minimal concentrations for obtaining a "Full" effect range from 10 mM for colchicine to 1 micrometer for amiprophosmethyl (APM) with incubation periods from 3 to 9 hours. The return to the normal microfibril orientation has been achieved in all cases except after podophyllotoxin treatment. Since APM has been claimed to act selectively on tubulin synthesis in Chlamydomonas it was decided to compare the effects of this compound with cycloheximide (10 microgram/ml) on the recovery of microfibril orientation after colchicine treatment. In both cases no orientation recovery is possible although in the case of cycloheximide, synthesis of cellulose is drastically inhibited. This cycloheximide inhibition is fully reversible. During cycloheximide, but not APM, inhibition cortical microtubules return; however, due to the inhibition of cellulose synthesis itself, they cannot exert their orienting influence.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
0070-2463
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
18
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
39-51
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1978
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Structure, synthesis and orientation of microfibrils. V. On the recovery of Oocystis solitaria from microtubule inhibitor treatment.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|