Linked Life Data

474524

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/474524

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1979-10-26
pubmed:abstractText
Two systems for quality control have been compared, viz., the whole-blood control preparation method and the algorithm method using the geometric moving average XB and a new estimator Y. The system involving whole-blood controls has the advantage of simplicity of operation, but the economic cost of commercial preparations is often high. The algorith system has the advantage that results of all the test samples are used in the calculation; to some extent, this provides a buffer against random variation. The number of count-outs in a given channel is related to the precision of the channel, which in turn is a function of the number of determinations and calculations required for that result. An error of around 1% is introduced into the result each time a calculation is performed. A successful quality control scheme should contain elements of both control preparation and algorithm methods.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0002-9173
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
72
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
426-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1979
pubmed:articleTitle
Intralaboratory quality control of hematology. Comparison of two systems.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study