Linked Life Data

4044436

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/4044436

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-11-8
pubmed:abstractText
In 1961, selection for 120-d weight was initiated in two flocks from a common base population of grade Targhee sheep. At Davis, sheep were maintained on a good plane of nutrition, on irrigated pasture or in drylot. At Hopland, sheep grazed annual grassland range, with supplementary feeding only at mating and lambing. Selected (DW) and control (DC) lines were maintained at Davis from 1961 through 1977. A selected (HW) line, replicate control (HC1 and HC2) lines and a line (DH) mated to the Davis DW rams were maintained at Hopland from 1961 through 1980, with the exception that HC2 was terminated in 1977. Multiplicative factors were used to adjust weights for effects of age of dam, sex and type of birth and rearing. Response to selection was estimated as the difference between selected and control line linear regression coefficients of adjusted line means on year. The Hopland replicate controls did not differ significantly from each other (HC1 - HC2 = .004 +/- .056 kg/yr), and the control line data were pooled (HC). The overall control line mean 120-d weights on a female, single, mature-dam basis were 33.2 and 30.4 kg at Davis and Hopland, respectively. Direct response was greater at Davis than at Hopland: DW - DC = .524 +/- .073 kg/yr (P less than .001); HW - HC = .151 +/- .034 kg/yr (P less than .001). Corresponding realized heritabilities were .17 and .06. Direct response for the DH line was DH - HC = .226 +/- .036 (P less than .001); realized heritability was .08. Response in the DH line was greater (P less than .05) than that in the HW line: HW - DH = -.075 +/- .037 kg/yr. This indicates that: (1) genetic improvement made on a higher plane of nutrition was expressed, but to a lesser degree, under range conditions and (2) selection under better feed conditions resulted in at least as much improvement in growth rate in a range environment as did selection under range conditions.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0021-8812
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
61
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
376-86
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Selection for weaning weight in Targhee sheep in two environments. I. Direct response.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.