Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-9-16
pubmed:abstractText
Thirty-three patients with either primary spinal cord tumors (n = 18), intradural tumors excavating into the cord (n = 9), or spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVM) (n = 6) were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. In 25 of 38 examinations (66%) (five patients were studied twice), MR provided more information than that provided by other neuroradiologic procedures. In several cases, MR affected patient management decisions. Advantages of MR, in addition to the absence of ionizing radiation and its noninvasive nature, include good spinal cord-CSF-theca contrast, lack of bone-derived artifacts, ease of multiplanar imaging, improved discrimination between intra- and extramedullary lesions, better definition of tumoral cavities and possible distinction from true syringes, ability to help one recognize thrombus formation within an AVM, and ease of follow-up of cord lesions for possible size changes. Apart from factors precluding the study in several patients (life support systems, pacemakers, claustrophobia, neurovascular clips), disadvantages of MR imaging include motion artifacts (prevalent in thoracolumbar area), poor capability of typing and grading of tumors, potential of false-positive results, poor detection of calcification, and poor delineation of feeders and drainers of AVM.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0033-8419
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
156
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
689-97
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Tumors and arteriovenous malformations of the spinal cord: assessment using MR.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article