Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
7
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-9-11
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
A previously unreported hazard of free-standing 'Tec' type vaporizers relating to their positioning downstream of the oxygen flush is presented. Three Enfluratec Mark III vaporizers were studied; measurement of delivered enflurane concentration was performed at a flow rate of 8 litres/minute, during and after the application of the oxygen flush upstream of the vaporizer. The maximum difference between the dial setting and the measured vapour concentration occurred when a 5-second flush was applied to a vaporizer set at 0.2 volume %, the peak vapour concentration recorded being 2.3%. Other hazards of free-standing vaporizers are discussed and ways of avoiding these hazards considered.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jul
|
| pubmed:issn |
0003-2409
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
40
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
661-3
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1985
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Free-standing vaporizers. Another hazard.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|