Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-9-9
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The results of a European survey on pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia have been compiled from a questionnaire completed by 18 different surgical teams. The total number of patients investigated was 2,161. Surgical treatment was prescribed by 94% of teams, whereas pneumatic dilatation was only prescribed by 56%. The indications for pneumatic dilatation were: inoperability (28%), drug failure (17%), surgical failure (11%). Nine surgeons believe pneumatic dilatation is indicated in all cases (50%), four consider it ineffective and useless (22%), and one expressed no opinion (6%). The arguments in favour of pneumatic dilatation are the fact that the procedure is minor and cost efficient and that it is relatively safe and effective with good long-term results in 75% of cases. Pneumatic dilatation should be used as the initial treatment in achalasia; surgery is only indicated in cases of failure.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0020-8868
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
70
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
17-21
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|