Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-7-19
pubmed:abstractText
This article describes a method for assessing whether the blindness of a double-blind study is maintained and, if not, whether failure to maintain blindness could have invalidated the results of the study. The benefit of using the method is illustrated in a study of the effect of nicotine gum on the tobacco withdrawal syndrome. In that study, many subjects were able to identify which drug they received; however, a drug effect was present among subjects who correctly identified their drug, among subjects who incorrectly identified their drug, and among subjects who could not tell which drug they received. Thus, failure to maintain blindness could not have invalidated the results of the study. The authors believe double-blind studies should routinely assess blindness, and they recommend their method as a simple and easy way to assess blindness.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0271-0749
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
5
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
138-42
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Blindness and the validity of the double-blind procedure.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't