Linked Life Data

3985488

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3985488

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-5-7
pubmed:abstractText
In order to determine whether any clinical or laboratory findings were helpful in differentiating acute appendicitis (AP) from acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), this retrospective study was undertaken. Records of all female patients 12 to 50 years of age, undergoing laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of AP over the past 15 years, were reviewed and pertinent data recorded. In comparing AP (n = 106) with PID (n = 39), longer duration of symptoms, relationship of onset of pain to the menstrual cycle, and frequent requests for gynecological consultation distinguished the PID from the AP cases. Although complete reliance cannot be placed on any clinical or laboratory finding in differentiating AP from PID, the final satisfactory outcome justifies laparotomy when the diagnosis cannot be established by other means.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0003-1348
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
51
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
217-22
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Appendicitis versus pelvic inflammatory disease. A diagnostic dilemma.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article