Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
5
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-5-23
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
In conclusion, animal experiments have shown the following: (1) extensive elevation (mobilization) of a nerve from its bed does not interfere with its capacity to regenerate as long as the longitudinal epineural vessels are preserved, (2) suturing nerve ends under tension has a deleterious effect on the final results, (3) when a segment of nerve has been resected, the remaining nerve and the site of repair can lengthen to accommodate joint extension (within limitations), (4) if there is a segmental loss of nerve and if the nerve ends can be approximated with 10-0 epineural sutures, even if the joints must be fully flexed, the result is better than using a nerve graft, and (5) when a graft is required, it is important to avoid reversing the nerve graft. We believe direct nerve repair is preferred when flexion of the joints and mobilization of the nerve ends permits approximation with 10-0 epineural suture.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
May
|
| pubmed:issn |
0032-1052
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
75
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
707-13
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-2-16
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1985
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
When should nerve gaps be grafted? An experimental study in rats.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|