Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
12
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-5-9
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The customary rigid rectoscope was compared prospectively, with a new, flexible one (prototypes of Olympus Opt. and Fuji) in each of 114 patients selected at random. Maximal depth of introduction was reached on average after 1 min with the rigid instruments, after 1 min 40 sec with the flexible one. Mean depth of introduction was 16 cm for the rigid and 33 cm for the flexible one. In 21 patients (18.4%) additional information was obtained with the flexible rectoscope. 80% of patients reported that the flexible instrument caused them no or only slight discomfort. Skill in using the flexible instrument can be quickly acquired.
|
| pubmed:language |
ger
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Mar
|
| pubmed:issn |
0012-0472
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:day |
22
|
| pubmed:volume |
110
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
445-8
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-11-21
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1985
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
[Rectoscopy: rigid or flexible? A comparative study].
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|