Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1986-4-10
pubmed:abstractText
The accuracy of new (non-invasive) techniques of carotid artery assessment is classically established by comparing the results of the method under study with those of conventional contrast angiography. It is, therefore, important to establish the reproducibility of data acquired from contrast angiograms. Categories of carotid lesion must be chosen such that good reproducibility is likely both on an inter and intra-observer basis. This paper suggests that the smallest useful number of categories be used. It a two category discriminating system (less than 25% and greater than or equal to 25% stenosis), inter-observer agreement was found to be 95% and intra-observer agreement 96%. The principal observer variation occurred at the 0% and greater than 0% level of discrimination and this should be avoided in future studies comparing new arterial assessment techniques with conventional angiography.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0021-9509
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
27
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
154-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Radiographic assessment of the extracranial internal carotid artery.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article