Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-10-7
pubmed:abstractText
Comparative studies between the in vitro human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) and our original in vivo method (NM-IA) in which the final evaluation was made with 3H-TdR incorporation of tumor cells transplanted into nude mice were simultaneously performed on 44 fresh human solid tumors (22 gastric cancers, 6 breast cancers, 4 gall bladder cancers, 4 liposarcomas and 8 other tumors). Mitomycin C (MMC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin (ADM) and cyclophosphamide (CPM) were tested. The evaluable rate was 73% (32/44) in HTCA and 89% (38/44) in NM-IA. Although correlation between the results of HTCA and those of MN-IA was obtained for MMC and ADM, no correlation was observed for 5-FU and CPM.
pubmed:language
jpn
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0385-0684
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1808-12
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
[Comparison of human tumor clonogenic and nude mouse-isotope assays in anticancer-agent sensitivity tests].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract