Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-4-30
pubmed:abstractText
The therapeutic benefits and toxicity profile of auranofin (AF) have been compared with that of gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) over a one-year period in 120 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A similar number of patients on both drugs remained in the study at one year (approximately 60%), and showed similar statistically significant improvement (p less than 0.01) in all clinical variables measured. At no time during the study was there a statistically significant difference in the clinical benefit obtained with either drug. Withdrawal from the study through lack of therapeutic benefit was twice as frequent with AF as with GSTM (11 compared to 6). Withdrawal due to a toxic reaction was twice as frequent and were potentially more serious with GSTM than with AF (15 compared to 9). We conclude that AF has a therapeutic potential similar to that of GSTM, however side effects were less prevalent and, when they did cause withdrawal of the drug, were potentially less serious.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0315-162X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
60-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
One-year comparative study of gold sodium thiomalate and auranofin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Controlled Clinical Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't