Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-3-29
pubmed:abstractText
Every prospective study published to date, whether randomized or nonrandomized, shows that the survival rate for patients with clinical stage I melanoma is the same, irrespective of whether they have an elective lymph node dissection (ELND). All the studies that purport to show a survival benefit from ELND have been based on retrospective data and are therefore subject to selection bias. Nevertheless, the data support the notion that there may be a small, select group of melanoma patients whose lives can be saved by ELND. This subgroup is made up of those patients who have epithelioid in small nests (ESN) melanomas. In the early stages of its evolution, this type of malignant melanoma metastasizes to regional lymph nodes and often does not have coexistent distant metastases. Other types of melanomas, when they metastasize, either bypass the lymph nodes or metastasize to the lymph node and simultaneously send distant metastases elsewhere, nullifying the anticipated benefit from an ELND. We encourage dermatologists, when they have a choice, to be supportive of those surgeons who have a choice, to be supportive of those surgeons who are actively participating in ongoing randomized trials designed to select patients who might benefit from ELND.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0148-0812
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
11
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
233-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Malignant melanoma prognostic factors 7: elective lymph node dissection.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't