Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-6-20
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The influence of the route and the frequency of IL 2 administration on the ability of IL 2 to induce the growth of activated T cells in vivo was evaluated. Initial pharmacokinetic studies confirmed that i.v. injection of IL 2 results in a relatively high peak serum concentration, but a short serum half-life. By contrast, i.p. or subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of IL 2 results in a lower peak concentration but a prolonged serum half-life. The bioavailability of IL 2 administered by these routes was assessed by measuring the in vivo growth of adoptively transferred T cells that had been previously cultured long-term with IL 2, because the growth of such cells in vivo has been shown to be proportional to the dose of IL 2 administered. The results demonstrated that i.p., s.c., or i.v. administration of IL 2 each resulted in marked donor T cell growth in vivo. Thus, IL 2 can function in vivo at sites distant to the sites of injection. In addition, the magnitude of T cell growth in vivo varied dependent on the route of IL 2 administration and correlated with the length of time IL 2 was detectable in serum, rather than the peak level achieved (i.e., IL 2 inoculated i.v. had the highest peak concentration but was least effective). As suggested by these findings, dividing the total dose of IL 2 into frequent low-dose injections was more effective in inducing T cell growth in vivo than was dividing the total dose of IL 2 into less frequent higher-dose injections. These studies confirm the great potential for IL 2 to induce the growth of activated of T cells in vivo and demonstrate that the rate of T cell growth reflects not only the dose but also the route and timing of IL 2 administration.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
0022-1767
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
134
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
3895-900
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Cell Division,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Drug Administration Schedule,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Injections, Intraperitoneal,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Injections, Intravenous,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Injections, Subcutaneous,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Interleukin-2,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Kinetics,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Lymphocyte Activation,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Mice,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-Mice, Inbred C57BL,
pubmed-meshheading:3872906-T-Lymphocytes
|
pubmed:year |
1985
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Interleukin 2 (IL 2) administered in vivo: influence of IL 2 route and timing on T cell growth.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|