Linked Life Data

3866291

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3866291

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7-9
pubmed:dateCreated
1986-2-18
pubmed:abstractText
The authors compared different methods of medical visualisation (standard radiography, arteriography, quantitative isotope bone scan, telethermography, CT scan, visualisation by nuclear magnetic resonance) in 52 osteogenic sarcomas. In the majority of cases the diagnosis was suggested by standard X-rays at the first visit. CT scan and visualisation by nuclear magnetic resonance are the two basic examinations both in terms of assessing the future single block excision as well as deciding the approach to be used for biopsy. Telethermography and quantitative isotope bone scan usefully complement clinical examination and standard X-rays in following the course during chemotherapy. Arteriography is indicated only in the presence of large tumors threatening the vessels directly.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0035-2659
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
52
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
463-71
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
[Comparison of different methods of medical images in the assessment of local extension of osteogenic sarcomas].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract