Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1987-4-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To compare the sensing characteristics of a solid tip, target tip (Medtronic) and orthogonal electrodes within the right atrial appendage, atrial electrograms were simultaneously recorded from 2 pacing leads in 11 patients. No significant differences were noted between atrial electrograms derived from target tip or a solid tip electrode in contact with atrial myocardium. Mean values for P-wave amplitudes of 3.0 vs 3.1 mV and slew rates 0.4 V/s vs 0.6 V/s, and QRS amplitudes of 1.0 vs 1.2 mV and slew rates 0.4 vs 0.2 V/s were obtained. The frequency content was also similar, with spectral maxima at 8 vs 9 Hz (P wave) and 7 vs 6 Hz (QRS). In contrast, atrial electrocardiograms derived from the orthogonal electrodes were significantly different: P-wave amplitude of 6.1 mV (p less than 0.025) and slew rate of 1 V/s and QRS of 0.13 mV and slew rate of 0.04 V/s. Spectral analysis was also dissimilar with maxima at 34 Hz (P wave) and 3 Hz (QRS). Orthogonal noncontacting sensing electrodes positioned within the atrial appendage offer substantially better electrographic P-wave amplitude detection and QRS rejection than contacting tip electrodes. These leads yield a significant improvement when discriminate atrial sensing is required.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
0002-9149
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
1
|
pubmed:volume |
59
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
610-4
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
1987
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Simultaneous right atrial appendage sensing with a target tip, a solid tip and J orthogonal electrodes.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|