Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-2-2
pubmed:abstractText
Many patients seeking care in the modern emergency center are capable of participating in treatment decision making. In the traditional emergency center consent process, the patient or a surrogate is asked to sign a general consent form purporting to authorize any treatment the emergency physician deems necessary. We discuss the ethical and legal inadequacy of this procedure. In addition, we present the results of a questionnaire assessing the comprehension of emergency center patients who participated in the general consent process. We found that few patients understood the purpose of the consent form and that patients in general had little understanding of their decision making authority. In light of our analysis and findings, we offer suggestions for improving the emergency center consent process.
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0196-0644
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
16
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
62-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
Informed consent in emergency care: illusion and reform.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article