Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1986-11-18
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Data analyzed in this study were derived from the responses of 128 spinothalamic tract (STT) cells and 110 thalamic neurons recorded in 75 anesthetized monkeys. A k-means cluster analysis, a nonhierarchical clustering technique, was performed using the relative magnitudes of responses to a graded series of innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli applied to the receptive field. For comparison, a parallel analysis was performed based on definitions of low-threshold (LT), wide dynamic range (WDR), and high-threshold (HT) cells used by our laboratory. For 128 STT cells, a classification scheme with three clusters was found statistically to be the best. This yielded groups of 22, 57, and 49 cells in clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cluster 1 cells were activated best by low-intensity mechanical stimuli, whereas cluster 3 cells were activated primarily by nociceptive stimuli. Cluster 2 cells had intermediate characteristics. When the classification scheme based on the cluster analysis was compared with the classification of the same neurons as LT, WDR, and HT cells, cluster 1 cells were divided into LT and WDR cells, whereas cluster 2 and 3 cells included WDR and HT cells. For 110 thalamic neurons, a classification scheme with five clusters was found statistically to be the best. Clusters 1-5 contained 25, 34, 17, 10, and 24 cells, respectively. Response characteristics of cells in each group indicated a gradual change in sensitivity to higher intensities of peripheral input from cluster 1 to 5. When this classification scheme was compared with the classification scheme previously used by our laboratory, cluster 1 cells belonged to the LT group, clusters 2 and 3 split into LT and WDR cells, and clusters 4 and 5 included WDR and HT cells. It is concluded that a classification scheme based on a cluster analysis of the responses of neurons to standardized stimuli may provide an objective and functionally meaningful way to categorize somatosensory neurons.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0022-3077
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
56
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
308-27
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Electric Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Macaca fascicularis,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Neurons, Afferent,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Physical Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Sensory Thresholds,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Spinal Cord,
pubmed-meshheading:3760923-Thalamus
|
pubmed:year |
1986
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Classification of primate spinothalamic and somatosensory thalamic neurons based on cluster analysis.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|